Make delivery repeatable
Create a controlled path from source code to a running service, including the application changes needed to support it.
- Docker and environments
- GitLab CI/CD
- Database migrations
- Release and rollback paths
I work on deployment pipelines, AWS infrastructure, monitoring, and recovery for production applications.
We start with your current setup and agree on the changes, ownership, and ongoing support.
I have worked on container pipelines, Terraform infrastructure, database migrations, workers, queues, scaling, and production monitoring.
Replace manual or person-dependent releases with a visible delivery path across environments.
Add logs, metrics, alerts, and run information that help the team see and diagnose real failures.
Make data protection, restoration, ownership, and response expectations explicit before an incident.
Inspect an existing AWS or container setup for avoidable risk, unclear ownership, and unnecessary operating cost.
Create a controlled path from source code to a running service, including the application changes needed to support it.
Connect the signals that matter to the people who must understand and act on them.
Document ownership, access, change procedures, support, and operating costs.
I review the application, environments, deployments, failure modes, and access. We identify the operating problems to address first.
Result: Prioritised deployment and reliability plan
I make the agreed changes to deployment, monitoring, and recovery.
Result: Deployment, monitoring, and recovery improvements
I provide the agreed maintenance, reviews, and improvements during business hours, with clear responsibilities and response expectations.
Result: Ongoing platform maintenance
I do not offer unrestricted 24/7 on-call support. We agree on business hours, response expectations, responsibilities, and escalation before ongoing work begins.
Yes. The review starts from the running architecture, accounts, deployment process, application constraints, and existing infrastructure code before proposing changes.
Usually not. The preferred approach is to address the highest-value delivery and reliability gaps first, then replace components only when the current design cannot support the required outcome.
It can include agreed maintenance, deployment support, monitoring review, backup checks, incident follow-up, cost review, and incremental reliability improvements. The exact boundary is written into the engagement.
Send me the application, hosting setup, deployment process, and main production concern.